The Individual vs. the State

نویسندگان

چکیده

The paper presents the profiles of three American thinkers associated with tradition individualist anarchism. These will be: Lysander Spooner (1808–1887), Albert Jay Nock (1870–1945) and Murray Newton Rothbard (1926–1995). were involved not only in writing, but also active participants political life time. In their opinion, state, whose genesis is based on violence conquest, individual are greatest enemies. state was perceived as threat to freedom individual, it violated principles natural law, which turn constitute moral foundation society. was, therefore, opinion these thinkers, something inherently unjust, because by force against its citizens forced them obey. They did perceive history terms class struggle, a struggle between individuals society state. compared gang robbers murderers (valuing higher than however) argued that constitution bind any way, had been signed personally, government no power over one handed free units. pointed gradual appropriation (“professional criminals”) competences belonging society, opposing goals both. He distinguished aims protect justice, plunder, law has created. advocated abolition tax consumer replacement an anarcho-capitalist order private property would be foundation. Theories Spooner, Rothbard, although directed negative. At roots good individuals. For they primarily workers, for Nock, citizens, entrepreneurs owners. This fact worth emphasizing, criticism anarchism often boils down allegations radicalism utopianism, without taking into account protectionist nature. Criticism always consequence human vision should considered from this perspective. concepts root article, addition presenting positions anarchists, we pay attention positive aspects show already nineteenth twentieth century anarchists recognized certain mechanisms power, occur particular intensity today.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the washback effect of discretepoint vs. integrative tests on the retention of content in knowledge tests

در این پایان نامه تاثیر دو نوع تست جزیی نگر و کلی نگر بر به یادسپاری محتوا ارزیابی شده که نتایج نشان دهندهکارایی تستهای کلی نگر بیشتر از سایر آزمونها است

15 صفحه اول

The Influence of Collaboration on Individual Writing Quality: The Case of Iranian vs. Malaysian College Students

This study purported to comparatively investigate the influence of collaborative writing on the quality of individual writing of four female Iranian and four female Malaysian students. The first semester students at a private university in Malaysia, who were comparable in terms of age, gender, study discipline, and language proficiency, were divided into two Iranian and two Malaysian dyads. The...

متن کامل

the impact of cooperative questioning vs. self-questioning methods on the reading comperhension ability of iranian pre- intermediate efl learners

این تحقیق به بررسی تاثیر استفاده از روش پرسش مشارکتی در مقابل روش خود پرسشی بر توانایی خواندن زبان آموزان سطح پیش متوسطه ایرانی می پردازد. در این تحقیق تلاش شده تا متوجه شویم که آیا این استراتژی ها تاثیری بر روی توانایی خواندن زبان آموزان دارد یا نه و کدام یک تاثیر بیشتری دارد. بر این اساس 98 زبان آموز انتخاب و از طریق تست مهارتی ماک تافل همگن شدند. سپس محقق آنها را به سه گروه تقسیم کرد که این ...

the effects of cooperative versus individual directed reading thinking activities on students inferential and referential questions

two groups of students were assigned as experimental and control ones, and were given instruction on directed reading-thinking activities and after some treatment, they were post-tested. although the initial pre-test did not show any significant differences, the final post-test result revealed that the cooperative reading comprehension helped the experimental group. the cooperative students’...

15 صفحه اول

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Ruch Filozoficzny

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['0035-9599', '2545-3173']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/rf.2022.032